Coronary disease & ACSSecondary analysis

10-Year Outcome of Complete or Infarct Artery-Only Revascularization in STEMI With Multivessel Disease

J Am Coll CardiolPublished

  • Secondary analysis of the DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI randomised trial
  • 10-year follow-up

Authors' conclusion

FFR-guided complete revascularization reduced future and repeated events compared with infarct-related artery only after 10 years.

Study context

Population
Patients with STEMI and ≥1 angiographically significant non-infarct-related lesion
Participants
627 patients
Comparison
Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization vs infarct-related artery only
  • Complete revascularizationn = 314
  • Infarct-related artery onlyn = 313reference
Primary endpoint
Composite of:
  • All-cause mortality
  • Recurrent MI
  • Any revascularization
Follow-up
10 years

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Hazard ratio

0.76

95% CI 0.60–0.94

P = 0.014

Complete revascularization vs Infarct-related artery only
HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.60–0.94); P = 0.014

Further findings

All-cause death · 10 years

OutcomeOR (95% CI)
Any revascularization · 10 years0.62 (0.44–0.89)

Mean cumulative number, per 100 persons

OutcomeComplete revascularizationInfarct-related artery onlyabsolute reduction (%) (95% CI)
Mean cumulative number of events (repeated events) · 10 years63 (95% CI 54–73)76 (95% CI 66–88)13 (−1% to 28%)

Recurrent MI · 10 years

No difference in recurrent MI
OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.60-1.35

Original publication

10-Year Outcome of Complete or Infarct Artery-Only Revascularization in STEMI With Multivessel Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. Published 20 May 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.05.013

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it