Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyRandomised controlled trial

5-Year Results From the AMPLATZER Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Randomized Controlled Trial

J Am Coll CardiolPublished

  • Randomised controlled trial
  • head-to-head device comparison
  • 5-year follow-up

Authors' conclusion

The 5-year outcomes from the largest randomized LAAO clinical trial demonstrated the long-term safety and effectiveness of the Amulet occluder and Watchman 2.5 devices.

Study context

Population
Patients with nonvalvular AF at high risk of stroke or systemic embolism (CHADS2 score ≥2 or CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥3)1,833 had implant attempt
Participants
1,878 patients
Comparison
Amulet occluder vs Watchman 2.5 device for LAAO
  • Amuletn = 917
  • Watchmann = 916reference
Primary endpoint
Oral anticoagulation (OAC) use and key clinical outcomes
Follow-up
Through 5 years

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Freedom from OAC and clinical outcomes · 5 years

Free of OAC

P = 0.009

Ischemic stroke or systemic embolism

P = 0.851

Stroke, systemic embolism or CV death

P = 0.666

CV death

P = 0.429

All-cause death

P = 0.217

OutcomeAmuletWatchmanP value
Annualized ischemic stroke rate1.6%/y1.6%/y

Further findings

OutcomeAmuletWatchman
Stroke severity
Nondisabling3819
Disabling1122
Fatal1117
Unknown1210
Device factors (device-related thrombus or peridevice leak ≥3 mm) preceding stroke or CV death31 events63 events

Stroke severity

Strokes less severe with Amulet

Safety

Major bleeding · 5 years

P = 0.882

Original publication

5-Year Results From the AMPLATZER Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. Published 18 November 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.10.101

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it