Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyCohort study

Acute and mid-term outcomes of ablation for atrial fibrillation with VISITAG SURPOINT: the Japan MIYABI registry

EuropacePublished

  • Prospective observational registry study
  • multicentre
  • 50 Japanese centres

Authors' conclusion

Despite lower anterior wall VS values compared with the CLOSE protocol (≥550), the present study demonstrated comparable efficacy outcomes, indicating that a VS of ≥550 for the anterior wall may not be necessary for Asian patients.

Study context

Population
Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) or persistent AF <6 months undergoing VISITAG SURPOINT (VS)-guided radiofrequency AF ablation (ThermoCool SmartTouch / SmartTouch SF), Japan1,002 completed AF ablation
Participants
1,011 patients
Outcome
Proportion of patients with PVI at the end of the procedure
Follow-up
End of procedure

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

PVI at procedure completion

Patients with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)

99.7%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence · up to 12 months

Freedom from recurrence
88.5%
Re-ablated
5.7%

Durable isolation at repeat ablation, by vein

RSPV
54%
RIPV
73%
LSPV
70%
LIPV
86%

VS values per procedure

Anterior wall, mean
428.8
Posterior wall, mean
400.4

Safety

Primary adverse events

Patients with primary adverse events (PAEs)
9 (0.9%)

Original publication

Acute and mid-term outcomes of ablation for atrial fibrillation with VISITAG SURPOINT: the Japan MIYABI registry. Europace. Published 25 July 2023. doi:10.1093/europace/euad221

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it