Acute cardiac care & resuscitation

Advanced hemodynamic monitoring during post-resuscitation care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a scoping review

ResuscitationPublished

  • scoping review
  • prespecified protocol
  • PRISMA-ScR methodology
+2 more
  • prespecified protocol
  • PRISMA-ScR methodology

Authors' conclusion

Advanced hemodynamic monitoring after OHCA remains heterogeneous, with a focus mainly on MAP and cardiac output. No single variable was consistently associated with prognosis or treatment response, although low SvO2 and elevated pulmonary artery pressure were associated with worse outcomes. Future studies should evaluate strategies integrating multiple hemodynamic variables and individualized patient-centered hemodynamic targets.

Study context

Population
Hospitalized adults after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with advanced hemodynamic variables reported beyond routine arterial blood pressure monitoringstudies included
Participants
Twenty-eight adults

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Most frequently reported hemodynamic variables

cardiac output

27/28 studies

mean arterial pressure (MAP)

25/28

central venous pressure

17/28

mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2)

14/28

Further findings

Monitoring modality

Monitoring predominantly invasive and most often based on pulmonary artery catheterization

Prognostic associations

Cardiac output showed inconsistent associations with outcomes
Low SvO2 and elevated pulmonary artery pressure associated with worse outcomes in some studies
  • heterogeneous

Hemodynamic targets

Variably defined and most frequently related to MAP-targets

Original publication

Advanced hemodynamic monitoring during post-resuscitation care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a scoping review. Resuscitation. Published 23 July 2026. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111218

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it