Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyRandomised controlled trial

Aggressive Risk Factor Reduction Study for Atrial Fibrillation Implications for Ablation Outcomes

JAMA CardiolPublished

  • Randomised controlled trial
  • open-label
  • multicentre
  • 3 sites in Adelaide, South Australia

Authors' conclusion

Among patients with AF, elevated BMI, and 1 or more additional cardiometabolic risk factors, aggressive risk factor management reduced arrhythmia recurrence over the 12-month period after catheter ablation.

Study context

Population
Patients with nonpermanent symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing first-time catheter ablation, body mass index (BMI) ≥27 and ≥1 additional cardiometabolic risk factor
Participants
122 patients
Comparison
Lifestyle and risk factor management vs usual care at AF ablation
  • Lifestyle and risk factor management (LRFM)n = 62
  • Usual care (UC)n = 60reference
Primary endpoint
Proportion of patients free from AF after ablation
Follow-up
12 months

Primary result

Freedom from AF · 12 months after ablation

Hazard ratio

0.53

95% CI 0.32–0.89

Events by treatment group

LRFM vs UC
HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.32–0.89)

As reported in the abstract

Further findings

Outcomemean difference (95% CI)
AF symptom severity · significantly improved with LRFM−2.0 (−3.7 to −0.3)
Outcomemean difference (kg) (95% CI)
Risk factor profile · 12 months — LRFM vs UC · body weight−9.0 (−11.1 to −6.8)
Outcomemean difference (cm) (95% CI)
Risk factor profile · 12 months — LRFM vs UC · waist circumference−7.0 (−9.4 to −4.5)
Outcomemean difference (mm Hg) (95% CI)
Risk factor profile · 12 months — LRFM vs UC · SBP−10.8 (−16.1 to −5.5)
Risk factor profile · 12 months — LRFM vs UC · DBP, no difference−3.5 (−7.2 to 0.2)

Original publication

Aggressive Risk Factor Reduction Study for Atrial Fibrillation Implications for Ablation Outcomes. JAMA Cardiol. Published 1 December 2025. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2025.4007

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it