Valvular & structural heart disease

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis

JACC AdvPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis

Pooled result · All-cause mortalityResult — go to the resultRelative risk 0.74 95% CI 0.65–0.86

Authors' conclusion

We found that patients receiving ACEIs/ARBs had a lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and new-onset atrial fibrillation. Risk of other outcomes was similar to patients not receiving ACEIs/ARBs.

Study context

Population
Patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)10 studies
Comparison
ACEi/ARB vs no ACEi/ARB after TAVR
Outcome
All-cause mortality
Methodological detailsrandom effects model, Literature search of PubMed and Cochrane Library until June 14, 2023
  • Random effects model
  • Literature search of PubMed and Cochrane Library until June 14, 2023

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Relative risk

0.74

95% CI 0.65–0.86

P < 0.01

ACEIs/ARBsvs No ACEIs/ARBs
RR 0.74 (95% CI 0.65–0.86); P < 0.01

Further pooled results

OutcomeRR (95% CI)P value
CV mortalityI2 = 0%; chi-square (heterogeneity) P0.70 (0.56–0.88)P = 0.54
New-onset AFI2 = 0%; chi-square (heterogeneity) P0.71 (0.52–0.96)P = 0.59

MI, HF, stroke, new permanent pacemaker, aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation

Similar risk with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)

Safety

AKI, major bleeding, vascular complications

Similar risk with ACEIs/ARBs

Original publication

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis. JACC Adv. Published 6 April 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100927

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.