Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyRandomised controlled trial

Antithrombotic Therapy after Successful Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

N Engl J MedPublished

  • Randomised controlled trial
  • international
  • open-label
  • blinded outcome assessment

Authors' conclusion

Among patients who had had successful catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation at least 1 year earlier and had risk factors for stroke, treatment with rivaroxaban did not result in a significantly lower incidence of a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or new covert embolic stroke than treatment with aspirin.

Study context

Population
Patients with successful catheter ablation for AF ≥1 year earlier and CHA2DS2-VASc ≥1 (≥2 for women or vascular disease)
Participants
1,284 patients
Comparison
Rivaroxaban vs aspirin
  • Rivaroxabann = 641
  • Aspirinn = 643reference
Primary endpoint
Stroke, systemic embolism or new covert embolic stroke (≥1 new infarct ≥15 mm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI))
Follow-up
3 years

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Rivaroxaban

5

events

Aspirin

9

events

Each group vs aspirinRelative risk (95% CI)
Rivaroxaban
0.56(0.19–1.65)
Each group vs aspirinAbsolute risk difference at 3 years, percentage points (95% CI)P value
Rivaroxaban
−0.6(−1.8 to 0.5)
P = 0.28

Further findings

OutcomeRivaroxabanAspirinRR (95% CI)
New cerebral infarcts <15 mm · 22 of 568 vs 26 of 5903.9%4.4%0.89 (0.51–1.55)

Safety

OutcomeRivaroxabanAspirinHR (95% CI)
Fatal or major bleeding (primary safety outcome) · 3 years1.6%0.6%2.51 (0.79–7.95)

Original publication

Antithrombotic Therapy after Successful Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. Published 8 November 2025. doi:10.1056/nejmoa2509688

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it