Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyMeta-analysis

Association between early and late atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences after pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Heart RhythmPublished

  • systematic review and meta-analysis
  • random-effects frequentist models

Authors' conclusion

ERATs within 0-90 days and 0-60 days after PFA are robust LRAT predictors, whereas first-month ERATs remain insufficiently investigated. Further studies are required to define the optimal blanking period after PFA.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing pulsed field ablation (PFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF), in observational or randomized studies with ≥1-year follow-up
Participants
3,003 Seven observational cohort studies
Comparison
Association between ERAT and LRAT after PFA for different blanking cutoffs

Pooled result

Association of ERATs within 0-90 days with LRATs · 0-90 days

Odds ratio

8.98

95% CI 5.61–14.37

ERATs within 0-90 days
odds ratio 8.98 (95% CI 5.61–14.37)

As reported in the abstract

Further pooled results

Positive predictive value of ERATs

within 0-90 days (95% CI, 0.55-0.76; I2 = 75%; 7 studies)
0.66
within 0-60 days (95% CI, 0.63-0.81; I2 = 23%; 3 studies)
0.73
within 0-30 days (95% CI, 0.16-0.90; I2 = 85%; 2 studies)
0.56

Diagnostic accuracy of ERATs within 0-90 days for LRATs

specificity
0.93 (95% CI 0.90-0.95)
positive likelihood ratio
5.83 (95% CI 4.09-8.32)

Meta-regression

Age, heart failure, and non-pulmonary vein ablation were significant effect modifiers

Original publication

Association between early and late atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences after pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm. Published 30 January 2026. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.01.034

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it