Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Association of Physician Certification and Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Contemporary LAAO is safe with low rates of procedural complications and no significant differences in procedural outcomes by operator subspecialty after multivariable adjustment.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing Watchman FLX or Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO), NCDR LAAO Registry, 2020–2022
Participants
91,711 procedures
Exposure
LAAO by EP vs IC operators
Outcome
MAE, mortality, ischemic stroke and major bleeding
Follow-up
Initial hospitalization and 45 days
Methodological detailsregistry-based (NCDR LAAO Registry), multivariable Cox regression
  • Registry-based (NCDR LAAO Registry)
  • Multivariable Cox regression

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

In-hospital death and MAE · initial hospitalization

Death

MAE

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Intracardiac echocardiography use

P < 0.001

Total radiation

P < 0.001

Death and major adverse event (MAE) at 45 days (multivariable regression)

No difference in death at 45 days, HR
1.03 (95% CI 0.89-1.20)
No difference in MAE at 45 days, HR
0.97 (95% CI 0.91-1.03)
  • After multivariable regression

Discharge antithrombotic regimen

EPs more likely to discharge on DOAC + aspirin; ICs more likely on single or dual antiplatelet therapy
all P < 0.001

Original publication

Association of Physician Certification and Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 28 October 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.020

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.