Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Atrial fibrillation and female sex: use of oral anticoagulants in a large European cohort and residual risk of thromboembolism and stroke

Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin OutcomesPublished European prospective cohort

Main finding · OAC prescriptionResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 0.79 95% CI 0.69–0.90

Authors' conclusion

In AF patients treated with OAC, the increased residual risk of STE associated with female sex was non-significant after adjusting for confounders and the competing risk of death. Both scores had similar predictive performance but CHA2DS2-VA showed worse reclassification compared with CHA2DS2-VASc.

Study context

Population
Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with CHA2DS2-VA score ≥1patients with CHA2DS2-VA ≥1, 41.8% women, mean age 70.1 (SD 10.0) years
Participants
10,080 patients
Exposure
Women vs men
Outcome
OAC prescription

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Odds ratio

0.79

95% CI 0.69–0.90

Women vs men
OR 0.79 (95% CI 0.69–0.90)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

IR, per 100 person-years

OutcomeWomenMensHR (95% CI)P value
STE rates in OAC-treated patientsAdjusted for confounders and the competing risk of death1.330.941.24 (0.89–1.74)P = 0.210
OutcomeNet reclassification index (95% CI)P value
Predictive performance of CHA2DS2-VA vs. CHA2DS2-VAScCHA2DS2-VA vs CHA2DS2-VASc · 0.603 vs. 0.605P = 0.665
Predictive performance of CHA2DS2-VA vs. CHA2DS2-VAScCHA2DS2-VA vs CHA2DS2-VASc · worse (i.e. negative) reclassification with CHA2DS2-VA−0.088 (−0.164 to −0.001)
  • Predictive performance of CHA2DS2-VA vs. CHA2DS2-VASc: CHA2DS2-VA AUC 0.603
  • Predictive performance of CHA2DS2-VA vs. CHA2DS2-VASc: CHA2DS2-VASc AUC 0.605

Predictive performance of CHA2DS2-VA vs. CHA2DS2-VASc

No significant differences in discrimination or net benefit

Original publication

Atrial fibrillation and female sex: use of oral anticoagulants in a large European cohort and residual risk of thromboembolism and stroke. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. Published 4 August 2025. doi:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf075

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.