Heart failure & cardiomyopathies
Atrial Mechanical Contraction Predicts Cerebrovascular Risk in Patients With Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy and Sinus Rhythm
Authors' conclusion
LA dysfunction, particularly AEMD and severely impaired LASc, is associated with increased cerebrovascular events in ATTR-CM.
Study context
- Population
- Patients with ATTR-CM in sinus rhythm not receiving anticoagulation, UK National Amyloidosis Centre, 2003–2023873 in sinus rhythm (SR) without anticoagulation
- Participants
- 2,310 patients
- Exposure
- Atrial electromechanical dissociation (AEMD) vs SR with left atrial (LA) mechanical contraction; Left atrial strain contraction (LASc) tertiles
- AEMDn = 115
- Outcome
- Cerebrovascular event (stroke or TIA, whichever first); death as competing event
Methodological detailssingle-centre
- Single-centre
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
Stroke or TIA · median 34 months
| Group | Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) |
|---|---|
| AEMD | 8.7 per 100 person-years |
| SR with LA mechanical contraction | 2.5 per 100 person-years |
Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA)
AEMD8.7 per 100 person-years
SR with LA mechanical contraction2.5 per 100 person-years
- Stroke/TIA in SR patients
- 85 (9.7%)
Observational data: associations, not effects.
Secondary outcomes
Incident atrial fibrillation (AF)
- Incident AF in SR patients
- 269 (30.8%)
- AEMD: 2.4-fold higher incident AF vs SR with LA mechanical contraction
1-year stroke or TIA by LASc tertile (SR without AEMD, n = 758)
- LASc <4% vs LASc >7%: 10-fold increased risk
- Consistent after adjustment for NAC stage and prior cerebrovascular events
- Adding LASc tertiles to CHA2DS2-VASc or CHA2DS2-VA significantly improved model fit and risk reclassification at 1 year
Stroke or TIA in baseline AF receiving anticoagulation
- Rate
- 0.7 per 100 person-years
Original publication
Atrial Mechanical Contraction Predicts Cerebrovascular Risk in Patients With Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy and Sinus Rhythm. J Am Coll Cardiol. Published 18 February 2026. doi:10. 1016/ j. jacc. 2025. 12. 033
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →