Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyCohort study

Aveir VR real-world performance and chronic pacing threshold prediction using mapping and fixation electrical data

EuropacePublished

  • Prospective cohort study
  • retrospective comparison cohort

Authors' conclusion

Aveir VR demonstrated satisfactory performance in this high-risk cohort. Pacing thresholds tend to improve to a greater extent than Micra after implantation. The PCT after fixation, even after a waiting period, has limited predictive value for the chronic threshold. Low-mapping PCT and high intraoperative impedance predict chronic low PCT.

Study context

Population
Real-world patients receiving Aveir VR leadless pacemaker; mostly advanced age and small body size88 reached 3-month follow-up
Participants
123 vs 139
Exposure
Aveir VR vs Micra
  • Aveirn = 123
  • Micran = 139reference
Outcome
Predictors of pacing threshold (PCT); high PCT ≥1.5 V, excellent PCT ≤0.5 V
Follow-up
3 months

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Predictors of 3-month PCT (Aveir)
Correlated with impedance at mapping
P = 0.015
Correlated with tether mode impedance
P < 0.001
Correlated with end-of-procedure impedance
P < 0.001
Correlated with mapping pacing threshold (PCT)
P = 0.035
Not correlated with PCTs after fixation
P > 0.05
Tether mode impedance >470 ohms predicting excellent 3-month PCT: sensitivity
88%
Tether mode impedance >470 ohms predicting excellent 3-month PCT: specificity
71%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

High PCT at end of procedure

P = 0.004

High PCT · 3 months

P = 1.000

Implant success (Aveir)
99.2% · 122 of 123
  • Implant success (Aveir): of 123 attempts

Safety

Complications (Aveir)

Patients with complications: 1 pericardial effusion after device reposition, 1 intraoperative device dislodgement
2 (1.6%)

Original publication

Aveir VR real-world performance and chronic pacing threshold prediction using mapping and fixation electrical data. Europace. Published 8 March 2024. doi:10.1093/europace/euae051

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it