Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesRandomised controlled trial

Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure and a Reduced Ejection Fraction: Long-Term Outcomes

Eur J Heart FailPublished

  • Randomised controlled trial
  • prospective
  • multicentre
  • two-arm
  • parallel-group
  • open-label
  • non-implanted control

Authors' conclusion

The BeAT-HF primary endpoint was neutral; however, BAT provided safe, effective, and sustainable improvements in HFrEF patient's functional status, 6MHWD and QOL.

Study context

Population
New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (EF ≤35%), prior HF hospitalization or NT-proBNP >400 pg/ml, NT-proBNP <1600 pg/ml, no class I CRT indication332 primary events
Participants
323 participants
Comparison
Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) plus optimal medical management vs optimal medical management alone
Primary endpoint
CV mortality and HF morbidity
Follow-up
Median 3.6 years/patient

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Rate ratio

0.94

95% CI 0.57–1.57

P = 0.82

BAT vs Control
rate ratio 0.94 (95% CI 0.57–1.57); P = 0.82

Further findings

Outcomewin ratio (95% CI)
Hierarchical composite win ratio · did not reach statistical significance1.26 (1.02–1.58)
OutcomeHR (95% CI)
Freedom from all-cause death, LVAD implantation, heart transplant · did not reach statistical significance0.66 (0.43–1.01)

Symptoms (quality of life (QOL), 6MHWD, NYHA class)

Durable, sustainable improvement with BAT
all nominal p < 0.001

Safety

OutcomeBATControl
System- and procedure-related major adverse neurological and CV event-free rate · throughout the trial97%Not reported in the abstract

Original publication

Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure and a Reduced Ejection Fraction: Long-Term Outcomes. Eur J Heart Fail. Published 12 April 2024. doi:10.1002/ejhf.3232

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it