Coronary disease & ACSRandomised controlled trial

Bleeding With Asundexian Versus Placebo in Patients With Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke or High-Risk TIA: OCEANIC-STROKE Randomized Trial

CirculationPublished

  • Randomized Trial
  • safety population
  • while-on-treatment analyses

Authors' conclusion

Asundexian added to antiplatelet therapy reduced ischemic stroke without significantly increasing major, major or CRNM, or any bleeding. Lower gastrointestinal bleeding was more frequent with asundexian, whereas treatment effects on major and major or CRNM bleeding were consistent across prespecified subgroups.

Study context

Population
Patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack receiving antiplatelet therapysafety population: received at least 1 dose
Participants
12,254 patients
Comparison
Asundexian versus placebo
  • asundexiann = 6,124
  • placebon = 6,130

Primary result

Major bleeding (ISTH)

csHR

1.10

95% CI 0.85–1.44

P = 0.46

Events by treatment group

As reported in the abstract

Further findings

Major or CRNM bleeding

csHR 1.12 (0.96–1.30) · P = 0.16

Any bleeding

csHR 1.02 (0.93–1.13) · P = 0.65

Major and major or clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) bleeding across prespecified subgroups

Treatment effects consistent across prespecified subgroups, including planned dual antiplatelet therapy

Safety

Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage

Any gastrointestinal bleeding

csHR 1.28 (1.03–1.59)

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding · primarily rectal bleeding

csHR 1.75 (1.27–2.41)

Procedure-related bleeding and mucosal bleeding

Any procedure-related bleeding and any mucosal bleeding did not differ significantly

Original publication

Bleeding With Asundexian Versus Placebo in Patients With Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke or High-Risk TIA: OCEANIC-STROKE Randomized Trial. Circulation. Published 13 October 2026. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.126.081836

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it