Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Catheter Ablation (CA) in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD) With and Without LV Fibrosis

JACC Clin ElectrophysiolPublished

  • randomized study

Authors' conclusion

In AF with LVSD, CA is associated with substantial improvement in LV systolic function and clinical status regardless of LGE status. Absolute 12-month LVEF and normalization rates are lower in LGE-positive patients, consistent with greater baseline disease severity, whereas higher scar burden appears to modulate the magnitude of recovery and may inform expectations regarding outcomes.

Study context

Population
Patients with AF and LVSD who underwent CA, stratified by LV late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonancepatients underwent CA · late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) positive 40 · LGE negative 40
Participants
Eighty patients
Comparison
outcomes of CA in patients with AF and LVSD stratified by the presence or absence of LV late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)
  • LGE positiven = 40
  • LGE negativen = 40

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Change in LVEF · 12 months

LGE positive

+20.3

ΔLVEF · ± 11.0 · %

LGE negative

+21.7

ΔLVEF · ± 11.8 · %

P = 0.578

Further findings

Unadjusted 12-month LVEF · lower in LGE-positive patients

P = 0.019

LVEF normalization (LVEF ≥50%) · 12 months · fewer LGE-positive patients achieved normalization

P = 0.004

Unadjusted 12-month left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) — Adjusted 12-month LVEF analysis: after adjustment for baseline cardiac magnetic resonance and markers of baseline disease severity, LGE status was not independently associated with 12-month LVEF, P =
0.849

Arrhythmia-free survival and AF burden reduction

Comparable between groups

Biomarkers, functional status, and quality of life

Improvements occurred in both groups

LVEF recovery by LGE burden

Higher LGE burden (>20%) associated with attenuated LVEF recovery

Original publication

CA in AF With LVSD With and Without LV Fibrosis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. Published 4 June 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2026.04.028

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it