Prevention & lipidsCross-sectional study

Cardiovascular Health Among Rural and Urban US Adults—Healthcare, Lifestyle, and Social Factors

JAMA CardiolPublished

  • Cross-sectional study
  • nationally representative

Authors' conclusion

This national cross-sectional study found substantial rural-urban disparities in cardiometabolic risk factors and cardiovascular diseases, which were largest among younger adults and almost entirely explained by social risk factors.

Study context

Population
US adults aged ≥20 years, 2022 National Health Interview Survey
Participants
27,172 adults
Exposure
Rural vs urban US adults
  • Ruraln = 4,256
  • Small or medium metropolitann = 14,741
  • Urbann = 8,175reference
Outcome
Age-standardized rates of cardiometabolic risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, DM) and CVD (CHD, stroke)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Age-standardised rates, rural vs urban

Rural

37.1%

Hypertension · Hyperlipidemia 29.3% · Obesity 41.1% · Diabetes 11.2%

Rural vs UrbanRelative risk (95% CI)
hypertension: 37.1% vs 30.9%
1.20(1.13–1.27)
hyperlipidemia: 29.3% vs 26.7%
1.10(1.03–1.18)
obesity: 41.1% vs 30.0%
1.37(1.27–1.47)
diabetes: 11.2% vs 9.8%
1.15(1.02–1.29)
CHD: same pattern (6.7% vs 4.3%)
RR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.35-1.85

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeEstimate
Rural-urban disparities, young adults aged 20-39 years (subgroup) — Rural vs Urban · hypertensionRR 1.44 (95% CI 1.12–1.86)
Rural-urban disparities, young adults aged 20-39 years (subgroup) — Rural vs Urban · obesityRR 1.54 (95% CI 1.34–1.77)
Rural-urban disparities, young adults aged 20-39 years (subgroup) — Rural vs Urban · DMRR 2.59 (95% CI 1.54–4.38)
Disparities adjusted for social risk factors — Rural vs Urban · hypertensionaRR 0.99 (95% CI 0.93–1.06)
Disparities adjusted for social risk factors — Rural vs Urban · DMaRR 1.02 (95% CI 0.90–1.15)
Disparities adjusted for social risk factors — Rural vs Urban · CHDaRR 1.08 (95% CI 0.91–1.29)
Disparities adjusted for social risk factors — Rural vs Urban · obesity (partially attenuated)aRR 1.29 (95% CI 1.20–1.39)

Disparities adjusted for health care access and lifestyle factors

Not meaningfully attenuated

Original publication

Cardiovascular Health Among Rural and Urban US Adults—Healthcare, Lifestyle, and Social Factors. JAMA Cardiol. Published 1 June 2025. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0538

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it