Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy for first-line treatment of atrial fibrillation in United States clinical practice

Heart RhythmPublished cohort

Main finding · Hospitalization for atrial arrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter, or tachycardia)Result — go to the resultAdjusted hazard ratio 0.52 95% CI 0.40–0.68

Authors' conclusion

First-line CA for both paroxysmal and persistent AF is associated with significantly lower risk of hospitalization for atrial arrhythmia consistent with results from randomized clinical trials and current Class I guideline recommendations.

Study context

Population
Persons with incident atrial fibrillation (AF) (2015–2022) in the Optum Clinformatics cohort, categorized by first-line rhythm control treatmentno total printed, counts by treatment group
Participants
2,711 vs 22,726
Exposure
Catheter ablation (CA) vs antiarrhythmic drug for first-line rhythm control therapy
  • CAn = 2,711
  • AADn = 22,726reference
Outcome
Hospitalization for atrial arrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter, or tachycardia)
Follow-up
1-year (3-month blanking period)
Methodological detailsOptum Clinformatics cohort, inverse probability of treatment weighting, Cox regression, clinical practice
  • Optum Clinformatics cohort
  • Inverse probability of treatment weighting
  • Cox regression
  • Clinical practice

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Adjusted hazard ratio

0.52

95% CI 0.40–0.68

CAvs AAD
adjusted HR 0.52 (95% CI 0.40–0.68)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeHR (95% CI)
AF-related electrical cardioversion52% lower risk with CA0.48 (0.34–0.68)
Hospitalization for heart failure74% lower risk with CA0.26 (0.13–0.54)
Atrial arrhythmia hospitalization, by AF type (subgroup)CAvs AADParoxysmal AF0.52 (0.37–0.73)
Atrial arrhythmia hospitalization, by AF type (subgroup)CAvs AADPersistent AF0.55 (0.37–0.81)

Original publication

Catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy for first-line treatment of atrial fibrillation in United States clinical practice. Heart Rhythm. Published 14 August 2025. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.07.061

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.