Coronary disease & ACSCohort study

Causal Endotype–Based Classification of Myocardial Infarction

JAMA CardiolPublished

  • Prospective multicentre registry cohort study
  • consecutive patients

Authors' conclusion

In this study, a causal endotype-based classification of MI identified distinct underlying mechanisms and clinical profiles that were not fully captured by the type 1/type 2 framework.

Study context

Population
Consecutive patients with adjudicated type 1 or 2 myocardial infarction (MI) (fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (UDMI)), AMIPE registry, 2017–2023
Participants
6,282 patients
Exposure
MI causal endotypes: cardiac/noncoronary, systemic, indeterminate vs cardiac/coronary
  • Cardiac/coronaryn = 5,330reference
  • Cardiac/noncoronaryn = 302
  • Systemicn = 503
  • Indeterminaten = 147
Outcome
Distribution of causal endotypes and underlying etiologies

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Distribution of causal endotypes

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeCardiac/coronaryCardiac/noncoronarySystemicIndeterminateadjusted HR (95% CI)
All-cause mortality · 1 year — Cardiac/noncoronary vs Cardiac/coronary9.8%15.9%25.8%1.4%1.46 (1.08–1.96)
All-cause mortality · 1 year — Systemic vs Cardiac/coronary2.50 (2.05–3.05)
All-cause mortality · 1 year — Indeterminate vs Cardiac/coronary0.22 (0.06–0.89)

All-cause mortality · 1 year

Higher mortality in systemic and cardiac/noncoronary MI largely related to noncardiovascular death

MACE and recurrent MI · 1 year

MACE rates differed less markedly across endotypes
Recurrent MI less frequent in cardiac/noncoronary and systemic than cardiac/coronary MI

Original publication

Causal Endotype–Based Classification of Myocardial Infarction. JAMA Cardiol. Published 29 August 2026. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2026.3794

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it