Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesResearch article

CMR Detected Atrial Structural and Functional Remodeling in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)

JACC Clin ElectrophysiolPublished

  • multicenter studies

Authors' conclusion

Sinus rhythm restoration with CA, along with reduction in biatrial size, led to increases in biatrial EF compared with MRC. AF burden, over the binary endpoint of rhythm at follow-up, better predicted changes in LAEF, functional status, and LVEF. LAEF predicts improvements in LVEF over the endpoint of sinus rhythm at follow-up, suggesting that restoration of atrial contractile function is a key feature of recovery in HFrEF.

Study context

Population
AF HFrEF patients from the CAMERA-MRI and CAMERA-MRI II multicenter studies17 women, age 60.7 ± 11.1 years
Participants
123 patients
Comparison
comparing catheter ablation (CA) to medical rate control (MRC)
  • CAn = 82
  • MRCn = 41

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Biatrial structural and functional parameters (CMR) · baseline and ≥6 months

CA patients had reverse remodeling of all structural and functional biatrial parameters

P < 0.001

Further findings

6MWT improved

  • 6MWT improved: P = 0.002

Independent associations with Δ LVEF (multivariable)

Δ left atrial emptying fraction (LAEF)
95% CI: 0.23-0.54; P < 0.001
AF burden
95% CI: −0.16 to −0.01; P = 0.020
sinus rhythm at follow-up was no longer significant
P = 0.865

Univariable predictors of Δ6MWT

ΔLAEF
R = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.52-2.47; P = 0.003
ΔLVEF
R = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.33-2.52; P = 0.011
AF burden
R = 0.27; 95% CI: −1.15 to −0.19; P = 0.007
  • none remained significant on multivariable analysis

Original publication

CMR Detected Atrial Structural and Functional Remodeling in AF HFrEF. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. Published 16 June 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2026.04.034

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it