Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyResearch article

Comorbidity phenotypes, prognostic implications, and Atrial fibrillation Better Care pathway effectiveness in patients with early-onset atrial fibrillation: A latent class analysis from the Tianjin Atrial Fibrillation Project

Heart RhythmPublished

  • latent class analysis
  • Tianjin Atrial Fibrillation Project

Authors' conclusion

3 heterogeneous comorbidity-based phenotype clusters were identified in patients with early-onset AF, associated with different treatment and prognosis. Full ABC pathway adherence improved prognosis in younger patients with AF, regardless of their comorbidity phenotypes.

Study context

Population
Patients with early-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) aged 18–45 yearspatients with early-onset AF (mean age, 38.68 ± 5.82 years, 781 [21.9%] female)
Participants
3,573 patients
Comparison
Comorbidity phenotype clusters 2 and 3 compared with cluster 1; ABC pathway adherence
  • cluster 1n = 1,897reference
  • cluster 2n = 1,037
  • cluster 3n = 639
Outcome
Composite of:
  • All-cause death
  • Major adverse cardiovascular events
Follow-up
Median 1408 days (interquartile range, 496-2532)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Each group vs cluster 1Hazard ratio (95% CI)P value
cluster 2
1.94(1.56–2.42)
P < 0.001
cluster 3
2.63(2.15–3.20)
P < 0.001

Further findings

Primary outcome with ABC pathway adherence

ABC pathway adherence (n = 1186 [33.2%] patients), HR for primary outcome overall, 95% Cl 0.40-0.56, P < .001
0.47
Similar benefits across different comorbidity phenotypes
Pint = 0.097
  • comparator for the ABC adherence HR not stated

Original publication

Comorbidity phenotypes, prognostic implications, and Atrial fibrillation Better Care pathway effectiveness in patients with early-onset atrial fibrillation: A latent class analysis from the Tianjin Atrial Fibrillation Project. Heart Rhythm. Published 3 August 2026. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.07.041

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it