Valvular & structural heart diseaseCohort study

Comparison of Early Outcomes Following Transjugular Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement Between Large vs Small Annulus

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished

  • Multicentre cohort study
  • 13 centres

Authors' conclusion

LuX-Valve Plus TTVR appears to be safe and effective in TR patients regardless of annular size, but TR reduction was more significant in the SAG, with specific differences in some major adverse events between groups.

Study context

Population
Patients with grade ≥3 tricuspid regurgitation (TR) undergoing LuX-Valve Plus transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR), 13 centres, May 2022 to March 2024
Participants
159 patients
Exposure
Large vs small tricuspid annulus in transjugular TTVR
  • Large-annulus group (LAG)n = 42
  • Small-annulus group (SAG)n = 117reference
Outcome
Early outcomes: device, procedural or intraprocedural success; TR reduction; 30-day primary endpoints or clinical success

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Trial-defined device or procedural success

P = 0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

TVARC-defined intraprocedural success

P = 0.001

Trial-defined primary endpoint · 30 days

P = 0.936

TRISCEND II-defined primary endpoint · 30 days

P = 1.000

TVARC clinical success · 30 days

P = 0.001

Safety

Severe paravalvular regurgitation · occurred only in the LAG

P = 0.017

New-onset third-degree AV block or pacemaker implantation · exclusive to the SAG

OutcomeLAGSAGP value
Severe bleedingNot reported in the abstract9.4%P = 0.391

Severe bleeding

Comparable between the groups

Original publication

Comparison of Early Outcomes Following Transjugular Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement Between Large vs Small Annulus. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 15 December 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2025.11.013

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it