Coronary disease & ACS

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction

CirculationPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

Use of the High-STEACS pathway incorporating low high-sensitivity cardiac troponin concentrations rules out myocardial infarction in more patients at presentation and misses 5-fold fewer index myocardial infarctions than guideline-approved pathways based exclusively on the 99th centile.

Study context

Population
Patients with suspected ACS, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I at presentation and 3 and 6 or 12 hours
Participants
1,218 patients
Comparison
High-STEACS rule-out pathway vs ESC rule-out pathway
Outcome
NPV of both pathways for index type 1 MI or type 1 MI or cardiac death
Follow-up
30 days
Methodological detailsprespecified subgroups
  • Prespecified subgroups

Performance

As reported in the abstract

NPV for index type 1 MI or type 1 MI or cardiac death at 30 days
Test or modelNPVRuled out at presentationRuled out at 3 hoursMissed events
ESC97.9% (95% CI 96.9-98.7)28.1% (342 of 1218)78.9% (961 of 1218)18 index and two 30-day events
High-STEACS99.5% (95% CI 99.0-99.9)40.7% (496 of 1218)74.2% (904 of 1218)2 index and two 30-day events

NPV

ESC97.9% (95% CI 96.9-98.7)
High-STEACS99.5% (95% CI 99.0-99.9)

Ruled out at presentation

ESC28.1% (342 of 1218)
High-STEACS40.7% (496 of 1218)

Ruled out at 3 hours

ESC78.9% (961 of 1218)
High-STEACS74.2% (904 of 1218)

Missed events

ESC18 index and two 30-day events
High-STEACS2 index and two 30-day events
  • High-STEACS vs ESC: P < 0.001
Primary outcome occurred
15.7% (191 of 1218)

Further findings

NPV in prespecified subgroups (age, sex, time of symptom onset, known ischemic heart disease)

NPV of High-STEACS greater than ESC in all subgroups, including those presenting early or with known ischemic heart disease

Original publication

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. Published 29 December 2016. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.116.025021

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.