Coronary disease & ACSMeta-analysis

Complete versus culprit lesion-only revascularisation for acute myocardial infarction (Complete Revascularisation Trialists' Collaboration): an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials

LancetPublished

  • Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials
  • one-stage IPD meta-analysis (Cox frailty model)
  • hierarchical testing

Authors' conclusion

In patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, complete revascularisation reduced the composite of cardiovascular death or new myocardial infarction as well as cardiovascular death alone compared with a culprit lesion-only PCI strategy. In addition, all-cause death was lower with complete revascularisation.

Study context

Population
Patients with acute STEMI or NSTEMI and multivessel CAD
Participants
8,836 patients · 6 RCTs
Comparison
Complete revascularisation vs culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
  • Complete revascularisationn = 4,259
  • Culprit lesion-onlyn = 4,577reference
Outcome
Composite of:
  • Cardiovascular death or new myocardial infarction
  • Cardiovascular death alone (hierarchical)

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

median follow-up 36.0 months (IQR 30.6-48.0)

Complete revascularisation

382 (9.0%) of 4259

CV death or new MI · CV death 155 (3.6%)

Culprit lesion-only

528 (11.5%) of 4577

CV death or new MI · CV death 209 (4.6%)

Complete revascularisation vs Culprit lesion-onlyHazard ratio (95% CI)P value
CV death or new MI
0.76(0.67–0.87)
P < 0.0001
CV death
0.76(0.62–0.93)
P = 0.0091

Further pooled results

OutcomeComplete revascularisationCulprit lesion-onlyHR (95% CI)P value
All-cause death7.2%8.1%0.85 (0.73–0.99)P = 0.039
Non-CV death3.6%3.5%0.98 (0.78–1.22)P = 0.85
New MI6.0%7.8%0.76 (0.65–0.90)P = 0.0011

Original publication

Complete versus culprit lesion-only revascularisation for acute myocardial infarction (Complete Revascularisation Trialists' Collaboration): an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. Published 9 November 2025. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(25)02170-1

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it