Coronary disease & ACS

Contemporary Trends, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stent Thrombosis

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

In this contemporary, nationwide, real-world analysis, there was no temporal change in the frequency of PCI for ST. Most STs were early or very late. PCI for ST was associated with a higher rate of in-hospital adverse outcomes.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute MI, NCDR CathPCI registry, US, April 2018–June 2023
Participants
2,023,032 patients
Exposure
PCI for stent thrombosis (ST) vs PCI for no ST
  • STn = 57,268
Outcome
In-hospital outcomes, PCI for ST vs non-ST
Follow-up
In-hospital
Methodological detailsregistry-based, nationwide
  • Registry-based
  • Nationwide

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

ST vs No STAdjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
MACE
1.24(1.19–1.29)
All-cause mortality
1.17(1.12–1.22)
Recurrent MI
1.80(1.63–1.98)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Frequency of PCI for ST
2.8% · 57,268

Frequency of PCI for ST

No temporal change in the frequency of PCI for ST during the study period

Timing of ST

Early
18,189 of 55,351 [31.8%]
Late
8,825 of 55,351 [15.4%]
Very late
28,337 of 55,351 [49.5%]
Unknown
1,917 of 55,351 [3.4%]

Safety

OutcomeaOR (95% CI)
Major bleeding · in-hospital1.18 (1.15–1.22)

Original publication

Contemporary Trends, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stent Thrombosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 9 March 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2025.11.045

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.