Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meds Matter: Impact of Adherence to Medical Therapy on Comparative Outcomes

CirculationPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Regardless of coronary revascularization strategy, medication adherence has a dramatic effect on long-term outcome. Among comparable patients who adhere to optimal medical therapy, outcomes of PCI and CABG may not differ; however, among nonadherent patients, CABG affords better major adverse cardiac event-free survival.

Study context

Population
NSTEMI patients undergoing coronary revascularization
Participants
973 vs 2,255
Exposure
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) vs percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), by adherence to optimal medical therapy
  • CABGn = 973reference
  • PCIn = 2,255
Outcome
MACE:
  • All-cause mortality
  • Nonfatal MI
  • Reintervention
Follow-up
Up to 8 years
Methodological details8-hospital network, propensity score matching
  • 8-hospital network
  • Propensity score matching

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

MACE (all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, reintervention), Cox regression
HR for MACE (95% CI)P value
Noncompliance with optimal medical therapy vs Compliance95% confidence limits
2.79(2.19–3.54)
P < 0.001
PCI vs CABG · 95% confidence limits; lower limit as printed
HR for MACE 1.68 (95% CI 138–2.04); P < 0.001
Propensity-matched, nonadherent to optimal medical therapy: CABG outcomes superior to PCI
P = 0.001
Propensity-matched, adherent to optimal medical therapy: CABG and PCI outcomes not different
P = 0.574

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

MACE-free survival, propensity-matched, by adherence (subgroup)

Nonadherent: CABG superior to PCI
P = 0.001
Adherent: CABG and PCI not different
P = 0.574
  • Propensity-matched

Original publication

Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meds Matter: Impact of Adherence to Medical Therapy on Comparative Outcomes. Circulation. Published 25 October 2016. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.115.021183

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.