Prevention & lipidsCohort study

Coronary Artery Calcium Progression and Cognitive Function in Midlife—The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study

Circ Popul Health OutcomesPublished

  • prospective CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) study, a longitudinal cohort

Authors' conclusion

CAC progression was associated with worse midlife processing speed and global cognition, independent of baseline CAC score and established risk factors. Repeated CAC assessments may offer clinical value for identifying individuals at increased risk for midlife cognitive decline.

Study context

Population
Black and White adults aged 18 to 30 years at baseline of CARDIA, with coronary artery calcium (CAC) measured by computed tomography at year 15 and at least 1 follow-up CAC measurement at years 20 or 25, and cognitive assessments at years 30 or 35mean baseline age 40.3±3.6 years, 56% female
Participants
2,341 participants
Exposure
baseline CAC score and CAC progression versus no progression

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Cognitive function by baseline CAC >0

baseline CAC >0

9%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Outcomebaseline CAC >0baseline CAC 0CAC progressionno progressionstandardized cognitive difference (95% CI)
Cognitive function by CAC progression · Digit Symbol Substitution TestNot reported in the abstractNot reported in the abstract26%Not reported in the abstract−0.14 (−0.23 to −0.06)
Cognitive function by CAC progression · Montreal Cognitive Assessment−0.09 (−0.17 to −0.01)
  • Cognitive function by CAC progression: adjusted for demographics, education, physical activity, depressive symptoms, APOE ε4 allele, and baseline CAC score

Cognitive function by CAC progression

CAC progression associated with lower processing speed and global cognition

Original publication

Coronary Artery Calcium Progression and Cognitive Function in Midlife—The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Circ Popul Health Outcomes. Published 16 February 2026. doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.125.012646

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it