Valvular & structural heart diseaseCohort study

Coronary Physiological Indexes to Evaluate Myocardial Ischemia in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Valve Replacement

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished

  • Prospective cohort study
  • multicentre

Authors' conclusion

In patients with severe AS and CAD, FFR ≤0.83 and RFR ≤0.85 appear to predict myocardial ischemia more accurately. Six months after AVR, FFR decreases, whereas RFR increases significantly with a simultaneous decrease of left ventricular mass and an improvement of microvascular function.

Study context

Population
Patients with severe AS and intermediate to severe coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR)
Participants
116 patients · 146 coronary lesions
Exposure
Coronary physiological indexes before vs after AVR

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Change in FFR and RFR after AVR · 6 months after AVR
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) change (mean ± SD)
−0.0279 ± 0.0368
RFR change (mean ± SD)
+0.0410 ± 0.0487
P for both
P < 0.0001
Lesions crossing traditional FFR cutoff
21.5% (21/98)
Lesions crossing traditional RFR cutoff
39.8% (39/98)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

LV mass · before vs after AVR

LV mass decreased significantly: 153.68 ± 44.22 g before vs 134.66 ± 37.26 g after
P < 0.0001

Microvascular dysfunction at baseline

Abnormal index of microvascular resistance
32.1%
Abnormal microvascular resistance reserve
68.6%
All microvascular parameters improved after AVR

Original publication

Coronary Physiological Indexes to Evaluate Myocardial Ischemia in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 28 October 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.024

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it