Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesRandomised controlled trial

Cost-Effectiveness of Vericiguat in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: The VICTORIA Randomized Clinical Trial

CirculationPublished

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis of the VICTORIA randomised trial
  • US health care sector perspective
  • lifetime horizon

Authors' conclusion

Vericiguat use in the VICTORIA trial met criteria for intermediate value, but the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio estimates were sensitive to whether the analysis accounted for observed NT-proBNP treatment effect heterogeneity.

Study context

Population
Patients with high-risk HFrEF in the VICTORIA trial
Participants
5,050 patients
Comparison
Vericiguat vs placebo
Primary endpoint
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, vericiguat vs placebo
Follow-up
Lifetime horizon

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
allowing for treatment heterogeneity (NT-proBNP interaction)
incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $66 509 per QALY
without heterogeneity
incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $124 512 per QALY

Secondary outcomes

Quality-adjusted life expectancy, with interaction term

incremental discounted QALY 0.43

Quality-adjusted life expectancy, without interaction term

incremental discounted QALY 0.17

Outcomeincremental discounted costs
Incremental discounted costs (vericiguat minus placebo) · with treatment interaction$28 546
Incremental discounted costs (vericiguat minus placebo) · without treatment interaction$20 948

Original publication

Cost-Effectiveness of Vericiguat in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: The VICTORIA Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. Published 6 September 2023. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.122.063602

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it