Acute cardiac care & resuscitation

Delays in chest compressions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: carotid versus subxiphoid point of care ultrasound

ResuscitationPublished Prospective observational study

Authors' conclusion

Paramedic-obtained carotid POCUS demonstrated a significant increase in view adequacy and fewer extended CPR pauses, as compared to subxiphoid views.

Study context

Population
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients managed by paramedics of a suburban, third-service emergency medical services (EMS) agency
Participants
107 patients248 POCUS recordings
Exposure
Carotid vs subxiphoid POCUS for pulse determination
Outcome
View adequacy and compression pause duration
Methodological detailssingle EMS agency, within-patient comparison
  • Single EMS agency
  • Within-patient comparison

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Compression pauses <10 s and adequate views

Pauses <10 s

Adequate view

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Overall pause length and view adequacy

%

Pause lengths <10 s
73 (n = 195)
Adequate view
62 (n = 153)

Interrater reliability of image adequacy

Kappa
0.85
Agreement
93 %

Original publication

Delays in chest compressions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: carotid versus subxiphoid point of care ultrasound. Resuscitation. Published 30 December 2025. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110953

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.