Acute cardiac care & resuscitation

Design and rationale of a multicenter paramedic randomized trial of noradrenaline versus adrenaline in the initial management of patients with cardiogenic shock—The PANDA trial

Am Heart JPublished prehospital, open-label, single-blind, randomized controlled trial

Study context

Population
Patients aged 18 years and older with suspected cardiogenic shock (clinical evidence of hypoperfusion, systolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg despite adequate volume resuscitation, suspected cardiac cause including cardiac arrest of estimated duration less than 30-minutes)anticipated enrolment, 450 recruited thus far
Participants
1,155 patients
Planned comparison
initial treatment with norepinephrine, compared with epinephrine
Primary endpoint
all-cause 28-day mortality
Follow-up
28 days
Methodological detailsmulticenter, paramedic-delivered, 1:1 randomization, design and rationale
  • Multicenter
  • Paramedic-delivered
  • 1:1 randomization
  • Design and rationale

No results yet. This paper sets out the design of a trial; its results are to come.

Further findings

Recruitment progress

Patients recruited thus far
450

Original publication

Design and rationale of a multicenter paramedic randomized trial of noradrenaline versus adrenaline in the initial management of patients with cardiogenic shock—The PANDA trial. Am Heart J. Published 10 February 2026. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107378

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.