Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesDiagnostic or prognostic study

Detection of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction From Electrocardiographic Images

CirculationPublished

  • Diagnostic accuracy study
  • multicentre
  • external validation
  • prospective cohort validation

Authors' conclusion

We developed and externally validated a deep learning model that identifies LV systolic dysfunction from ECG images.

Study context

Population
Adults with 12-lead ECGs and echocardiograms within 15 days, Yale New Haven Hospital 2015–2021; external validation at US centres and the prospective ELSA-Brasil cohortECGs, model development
Participants
385,601 adults
Comparison
Internal validation vs Cedars Sinai vs Outpatient Yale New Haven Hospital clinics vs Lake Regional Hospital vs Memorial Hermann Southeast Hospital vs Methodist Cardiology Clinic vs Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health
Outcome
Detection of LVEF <40% (AUROC, AUPRC)

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Detection of LVEF <40% from ECG images
Test or modelAUROCAUPRC
Internal validation0.910.55
Cedars Sinai0.900.53
Outpatient Yale New Haven Hospital clinics0.940.77
Lake Regional Hospital0.900.88
Memorial Hermann Southeast Hospital0.910.88
Methodist Cardiology Clinic0.900.74
Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health0.950.45

Further findings

Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction on transthoracic echocardiogram

ComparisonOR (95% CI)
ECG suggestive of LV systolic dysfunction · held-out set27.5 (22.3–33.9)

Incident LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF ≥40% at initial assessment) · median follow-up, 3.2 years

ComparisonHR (95% CI)
Positive ECG screen3.9 (3.3–4.7)

Class-discriminative patterns

Localized to anterior and anteroseptal leads (V2 and V3), regardless of ECG layout

Original publication

Detection of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction From Electrocardiographic Images. Circulation. Published 25 July 2023. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.122.062646

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it