Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Development and validation of the GLORIA-AF Stroke Weighted Risk Score for patients with atrial fibrillation

EuropacePublished Development and validation of an interpretable weighted score

Authors' conclusion

The GLORIA-AF Stroke Weighted Risk Score provides risk refinement beyond CHA2DS2-VA while retaining discrimination consistent with more complex models. External validation supports its transportability and potential adjunctive role in guideline-directed thromboembolic risk assessment.

Study context

Population
Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in GLORIA-AF Phase II/IIIderivation cohort, external validation 8309 patients · Derivation cohort (GLORIA-AF Phase II/III) 20,517 · External validation (EORP-AF and APHRS-AF) 8,309
Participants
20,517 patientsEvents: 487 (2.4%)
Predictors
Ten selected predictors formed a 0-23-point score (GLORIA-AF Stroke Weighted Risk Score), from 17 baseline predictors
Predicted outcome
stroke
Methodological detailstime-to-event framework, LASSO-penalized Cox regression with stability selection, external validation in EORP-AF and APHRS-AF registries
  • Time-to-event framework
  • LASSO-penalized Cox regression with stability selection
  • External validation in EORP-AF and APHRS-AF registries

Model performance

As reported in the abstract

C-index
Derived score (derivation cohort)
0.661(95% CI, 0.636-0.685)
CHA2DS2-VA (derivation cohort)
0.626
CHA2DS2-VASc (derivation cohort)
0.615
Derived scoreexternal validation; 147 strokes
0.652(95% CI, 0.614-0.690)
CHA2DS2-VAexternal validation; 147 strokes
0.616 (95% CI, 0.598-0.634
  • Derived score vs CHA2DS2-VA P < 0.001
  • Derived score vs CHA2DS2-VASc P < 0.001
  • Derived score vs unweighted score P = 0.016
  • No significant difference from the full Cox or machine learning models

Further findings

Stroke (external validation; 147 strokes)

P < 0.001

Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI)/net reclassification improvement (NRI), calibration and decision curve analyses

Supported improved risk differentiation, close calibration, and generally greater net benefit than CHA2DS2-VA

Discrimination among patients without baseline anticoagulation

Score retained higher discrimination than CHA2DS2-VA
P < 0.001

Derivation cohort characteristics

Age, mean (SD)
69.9 (10.3) years
Women
9196 (44.8%)
Receiving anticoagulation at baseline
17 397 (84.8%)

Original publication

Development and validation of the GLORIA-AF Stroke Weighted Risk Score for patients with atrial fibrillation. Europace. Published 29 August 2026. doi:10.1093/europace/euag236

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.