Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyRandomised controlled trial

Device-Assisted vs Standard Valsalva Maneuver for Terminating Supraventricular Tachycardia

JAMA CardiolPublished

  • Randomised controlled trial
  • single-centre
  • open-label

Authors' conclusion

Per the results of this randomized clinical trial, the handheld Valsalva assist device significantly enhances VM effectiveness, providing a potentially implementable solution for SVT management.

Study context

Population
Patients with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) (aged 16–80 years) undergoing electrophysiological study, induced SVT, tertiary hospital210 in primary analysis
Participants
212 patients
Comparison
Device-assisted Valsalva maneuver (VM) vs standard VM
  • Device-assisted VMn = 106
  • Standard VMn = 106reference
Primary endpoint
Immediate cardioversion success (12-lead ECG-confirmed sinus rhythm within 1 minute) postintervention
Follow-up
Within 1 minute

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Conversion to sinus rhythm within 1 minute after 2 VMs

Odds ratio

4.16

95% CI 2.36–7.47

P < 0.001

Events by treatment group

Device-assisted VM vs Standard VM
OR 4.16 (95% CI 2.36–7.47); P < 0.001

Original publication

Device-Assisted vs Standard Valsalva Maneuver for Terminating Supraventricular Tachycardia. JAMA Cardiol. Published 1 March 2026. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2025.5489

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it