Coronary disease & ACSDiagnostic or prognostic study

Diagnostic Performance of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary CT Angiography

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished

  • Diagnostic accuracy study
  • prospective

Authors' conclusion

The study confirms the potential of AccuFFRct as a noninvasive alternative to invasive FFR for detecting ischemia in coronary artery disease and to risk stratify patients.

Study context

Population
Patients with CAD undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR)
Participants
339 patients · 404 vessels
Comparison
AccuFFRct vs invasive FFR; vs CCTA and QCA
Outcome
Diagnostic performance for lesion-specific ischemia (invasive FFR ≤0.80 as reference)

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Detection of lesion-specific ischemia (FFR ≤0.80)
Test or modelAccuracySensitivitySpecificityPPVNPVAUC
AccuFFRct90.6% (95% CI: 87.3%-93.3%)90.9% (95% CI: 85.1%-94.9%)90.4% (95% CI: 86.1%-93.8%)85.3% (95% CI: 79.8%-89.5%)94.2% (95% CI: 90.8%-96.4%)0.93 [95% CI: 0.89-0.95]
CCTA0.77 [95% CI: 0.72-0.81]
QCA0.89 [95% CI: 0.85-0.92]
  • AccuFFRct vs CCTA: P < 0.001 — 0.93 vs 0.77
  • AccuFFRct vs QCA: P = 0.048 — 0.93 vs 0.89

Further findings

Accuracy across subgroups (lesion classification, clinical presentation, stenosis severity, location, gray zone)

AccuFFRct maintained high diagnostic accuracy across subgroups and in the gray zone

Rate of unnecessary invasive tests (≥70% stenosis)

Reduced with AccuFFRct (33.1% vs 6.6%)
P < 0.001

Original publication

Diagnostic Performance of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary CT Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 21 August 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2024.06.027

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it