Heart failure & cardiomyopathies
Differences between men and women in guideline-directed medical therapy implementation, tolerability, and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Authors' conclusion
Guideline-directed medical therapy initiation and sequencing were comparable between men and women, but differences were observed in dose achievement, treatment tolerability, and clinical outcomes. These findings underscore the need for implementation and dosing strategies that account for differences between men and women.
Study context
- Population
- Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (de novo, chronic, and worsening heart failure)
- Participants
- 3,367 HFrEF patients
- Exposure
- Compared men and women regarding guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) implementation, side effects, change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and clinical outcomes
- Menn = 2,408reference
- Womenn = 959
- Outcome
- Quadruple therapy
- Follow-up
- 12-month follow-up
Methodological details48 Dutch hospitals, inclusion June 2022-February 2024
- 48 Dutch hospitals
- Inclusion June 2022-February 2024
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
P = 0.729
Observational data: associations, not effects.
Further findings
Quadruple therapy at ≥50% of target doses · Men more often achieved
P = 0.004
LVEF improvement in de novo HFrEF · women showed greater LVEF improvement
P = 0.005
| Outcome | aHR (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Composite endpoint (first HF hospitalization or all-cause death) in chronic HFrEFLower risk in women | 0.64 (0.45–0.91) | P = 0.015 | |
| 0.512Adjusted hazard ratio (log scale) |
Safety
Downgrades due to side effects
ARB
MRA
- Downgrades due to side effects: ARB P = 0.040
- Downgrades due to side effects: MRA P = 0.038
Original publication
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →