Valvular & structural heart disease

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Rheumatic Heart Disease-Associated Atrial Fibrillation Post-Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Replacement

JACC Clin ElectrophysiolPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Among patients with RHD-associated AF patients post-bioprosthetic MVR, DOACs are associated with lower major bleeding and comparable effectiveness, indicating a potential alternative to warfarin.

Study context

Population
Patients with rheumatic heart disease (RHD)-associated atrial fibrillation (AF) after bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (MVR)matched cohort n = 1,832
Participants
3,950 patients
Exposure
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs warfarin
  • DOACn = 916
  • Warfarinn = 916reference
Outcome
Ischemic events (effectiveness) and major bleeding (safety)
Follow-up
5-year follow-up
Methodological detailspropensity-score matched
  • Propensity-score matched

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Ischemic events
  • No significant difference in ischemic events, DOAC vs warfarin
  • Matched cohort (n = 1,832)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Secondary outcomes

All-cause mortality, cardiac thrombosis, MI, all-cause hospitalization · 5-year follow-up

No significant difference in mortality, cardiac thrombosis, MI or hospitalization

Safety

OutcomeHR (95% CI)
Major bleeding · 5-year follow-up0.76 (0.62–0.94)
  • Major bleeding: matched cohort (n = 1,832)

Original publication

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Rheumatic Heart Disease-Associated Atrial Fibrillation Post-Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Replacement. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. Published 2 October 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2024.08.005

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.