Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyRandomised controlled trial

Direct oral anticoagulants versus no anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage with atrial fibrillation (PRESTIGE-AF): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

LancetPublished

  • Randomised controlled trial
  • multicentre
  • open-label
  • phase 3
  • 75 hospitals in six European countries
  • masked events adjudication committee

Authors' conclusion

DOACs effectively prevent ischaemic strokes in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage with atrial fibrillation but a part of this benefit is offset by a substantially increased risk of recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage.

Study context

Population
Adults with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, AF, an indication for anticoagulation and modified Rankin Scale score ≤4
Participants
319 adults
Comparison
DOAC vs no anticoagulation
  • DOACn = 158
  • No anticoagulantn = 161reference
Primary endpoint
Coprimary: first ischaemic stroke (superiority) and first recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage (non-inferiority, margin HR <1.735)
Follow-up
Median 1.4 years

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

DOAC vs No anticoagulantHRP value
first ischaemic stroke
0.05(95% CI 0.01–0.36)
log-rank p<0.0001
first recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage; non-inferiority not met (margin <1.735)
10.89(90% CI 1.95–60.72)
P = 0.96

Further findings

All ischaemic stroke events

All intracerebral haemorrhage

Death

Safety

Serious adverse events · intention-to-treat

Original publication

Direct oral anticoagulants versus no anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke in survivors of intracerebral haemorrhage with atrial fibrillation (PRESTIGE-AF): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. Published 26 February 2025. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00333-2

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it