Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Distinct Purkinje electrogram phenotypes at ventricular fibrillation trigger sites in idiopathic and structural heart disease

Heart RhythmPublished

  • Purkinje-targeted ventricular fibrillation (VF) ablation
  • consecutive patients
+1 more
  • consecutive patients

Authors' conclusion

Purkinje electrogram morphology at VF-triggering sites differs between idiopathic and structural heart disease and is consistent with differences at the Purkinje-myocardial interface. These findings suggest that electrogram phenotype may inform selection of focal vs substrate-based ablation strategies, supporting a tailored approach that balances arrhythmia control with conduction system preservation.

Study context

Population
Patients with idiopathic and structural heart disease undergoing Purkinje-targeted catheter ablation for VF12 patients with discrete trigger localization and high-quality recordings quantitatively analyzed (4 idiopathic, 8 structural) · idiopathic 12 · structural 25
Participants
37 patients
Comparison
Purkinje electrogram morphology at VF-triggering sites in patients with idiopathic and structural heart disease
  • structural VFn = 8
  • idiopathic VFn = 4

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Abnormal Purkinje-like electrograms

Further findings

Purkinje potential duration

Purkinje-ventricular intervals

Outcomestructural VFidiopathic VF
Multiphasic components3.0 ± 1.11.0 ± 0.0
VF-free survival · 12-month80.0%Not reported in the abstractidiopathic VF: not reported in the abstract
  • Multiphasic components: P < .001
  • Purkinje potential duration: P < .001
  • Purkinje-ventricular intervals: P < .001
  • VF-free survival: P = .79
  • VF-free survival: group order as printed: "between groups (83.3% vs 80.0%)"; assignment assumed idiopathic first per earlier order
  • VF-free survival: 12-month VF-free survival was similar between groups (83.3% vs 80.0%; P = .79), without specifying which percentage corresponds to idiopathic versus structural VF

Purkinje-to-ventricular intervals in 2 patients with structural VF without voltage-defined scar (septal substrate on computed tomography)

Purkinje-to-ventricular intervals
28 and 35 ms
values intermediate between those observed in idiopathic VF and voltage scar-positive structural VF

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Distinct Purkinje electrogram phenotypes at ventricular fibrillation trigger sites in idiopathic and structural heart disease. Heart Rhythm. Published 27 April 2026. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.04.037

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it