Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyDiagnostic or prognostic study

DOAC score among patients receiving Vitamin K antagonists

Am Heart JPublished

  • external validation of a bleeding risk score in a pooled clinical trials cohort and a registry

Authors' conclusion

In patients with atrial fibrillation taking VKAs, the DOAC score was able to risk stratify patients based on bleeding risk, had moderate discrimination, and out-performed the HAS-BLED score in both a pooled clinical trials cohort and a usual care registry.

Study context

Population
Patients with atrial fibrillation receiving vitamin K antagonistspatients receiving vitamin K antagonists, per cohort · COMBINE-AF 28,818 · GARFIELD-AF 20,183
Comparison
DOAC score discrimination compared with HAS-BLED using DeLong's test

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Major bleeding event, COMBINE-AF · 1 year

Patients with major bleeding, COMBINE-AF

994 (3.4%)

Further findings

OutcomeValuesC-statisticP value
Major bleeding rate by DOAC score risk category, COMBINE-AF · 1 yearvery low 1.8 events per 100 person-years · low 3.0 events/100 p-y · moderate 4.6 events/100 p-y · high 5.6 events/100 p-y · very high 7.9 events/100 p-y
Discrimination, COMBINE-AF · 1 year · moderate and higher than HAS-BLED0.62 vs 0.59P < 0.001
Major bleeding rate by DOAC score risk category, GARFIELD-AF · 1 yearvery low 0.8 events per 100 person-years · low 1.5 events/100 p-y · moderate 2.2 events/100 p-y · high 3.2 events/100 p-y · very high 7.6 events/100 p-y
Discrimination, GARFIELD-AF · 1 year · moderate and higher than the HAS-BLED score0.65 vs 0.62P < 0.001

Major bleeding event, GARFIELD-AF · 1 year

Patients with major bleeding, GARFIELD-AF
313 (1.6%)

Original publication

DOAC score among patients receiving Vitamin K antagonists. Am Heart J. Published 23 June 2026. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107520

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it