Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesCohort study

Dyssynchrony and Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients With Unfavorable Electrical Characteristics

JACC Cardiovasc ImagingPublished

  • Prospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

In patients with UEC, echocardiographic assessment of EMD may help to select patients who will derive benefit from CRT.

Study context

Population
Heart failure (HF) patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with unfavorable electrical characteristics (atypical LBBB, RBBB or unspecified intraventricular conduction disturbance)of 551 receiving CRT
Participants
121 patients
Exposure
Echocardiographic electromechanical dyssynchrony (EMD) indices vs CRT response and outcome
Outcome
CRT response (relative decrease in LV end-systolic volume ≥15%); all-cause death or HF hospitalization
Follow-up
9-month (response)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

CRT response · 9 months
multivariate analysis
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)P value
GWW ≥200 mm Hg%
4.17(1.33–14.56)
P = 0.0182
Longitudinal strain septal contraction patterns 1 and 2
10.05(2.82–43.97)
P < 0.001
CRT responders
68 (56%)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Death or HF hospitalization, by number of positive EMD criteria · 46-month follow-up (IQR: 42-55 months)

Comparison2 criteria1 criterion0 criteriaadjusted HR (95% CI)P value
absence of either of the 2 criteria · adjusted for established predictors of outcome after CRT87%59%27%4.83 (1.84–12.68)P = 0.001
  • Death or HF hospitalization, by number of positive EMD criteria: per-group values = survival free from death or HF hospitalization

Original publication

Dyssynchrony and Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients With Unfavorable Electrical Characteristics. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Published 8 March 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.12.023

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it