Valvular & structural heart disease

Effectiveness of Pre-TAVR Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) as a Screening Tool for Significant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)

JACC Cardiovasc IntervPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

Pre-TAVR CTA has a high NPV for high-grade proximal stenosis of each coronary artery.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing TAVR at Cleveland Clinic with preprocedural CTA and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and no prior PCI, 2015–2021
Participants
2,217 patients
Comparison
Pre-TAVR CTA vs ICA
Outcome
Diagnostic performance of CTA for significant proximal CAD (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, Cohen Kappa)
Methodological detailsretrospective, single-centre, blinded to ICA results
  • Retrospective
  • Single-centre
  • Blinded to ICA results

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Detection of proximal coronary stenosis by CTA vs ICA
Test or modelSensitivity (≥50% stenosis)Specificity (≥50% stenosis)PPV (≥50% stenosis)NPV (≥50% stenosis)Sensitivity (≥70% stenosis)Specificity (≥70% stenosis)PPV (≥70% stenosis)NPV (≥70% stenosis)
CTA90%92%74%97%91%97%83%99%

CTA

Sensitivity (≥50% stenosis)90%
Specificity (≥50% stenosis)92%
PPV (≥50% stenosis)74%
NPV (≥50% stenosis)97%
Sensitivity (≥70% stenosis)91%
Specificity (≥70% stenosis)97%
PPV (≥70% stenosis)83%
NPV (≥70% stenosis)99%

Further findings

Bypass graft patency

Sensitivity
86%
Specificity
97%
PPV
84%
NPV
98%

Agreement between pre-TAVR CTA and ICA (Cohen Kappa)

Substantial to near perfect agreement

Original publication

Effectiveness of Pre-TAVR CTA as a Screening Tool for Significant CAD Before TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Published 28 August 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.030

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.