HypertensionSecondary analysis

Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Frailty

J Am Coll CardiolPublished

  • Secondary analysis of the ESPRIT randomised trial
  • post hoc analysis

Authors' conclusion

Hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risk benefit from the treatment strategy of targeting systolic BP <120 mm Hg, regardless of their frailty status. In addition, the effects of intensive treatment on experiencing adverse events did not differ by frailty status.

Study context

Population
Hypertensive patients at high CV risk in the ESPRIT trial, categorized by baseline frailty index (Rockwood cumulative deficit approach)
Participants
11,255 patients
Comparison
Intensive blood pressure (BP) control vs standard treatment, by frailty status
  • Nonfrailn = 4,366reference
  • Moderately frailn = 5,257
  • Severely frailn = 1,632
Primary endpoint
MACE (MI, hospitalization for HF, stroke or CV death), by frailty status

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

MACE, intensive vs standard treatment, by frailty level
Intensive treatment vs NonfrailRelative risk (95% CI)
nonfrail
0.84(0.65–1.08)
moderately frail
0.83(0.70–0.99)
severely frail
0.86(0.69–1.08)

Further findings

All-cause death, by frailty level

Effects on all-cause death showed a similar pattern

Absolute risk reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), CV death and all-cause death

Greater absolute risk reductions with increasing frailty; interactions not significant

Effects across continuous frailty index (FI)

Effects of intensive treatment consistent across the spectrum of continuous FI

Safety

OutcomeHR (95% CI)
Serious adverse events, by frailty level — Moderately frail vs Nonfrail1.32 (1.24–1.41)
Serious adverse events, by frailty level — Severely frail vs Nonfrail1.68 (1.54–1.84)

Serious adverse events, by frailty level

None of the safety outcomes differed by frailty status

Original publication

Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Frailty. J Am Coll Cardiol. Published 15 October 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.08.092

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it