Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesSecondary analysis

EMPEROR-Preserved Risk Model and Outcomes in the FINEARTS-HF Trial

JAMA CardiolPublished

  • Secondary analysis of the FINEARTS-HF randomised trial
  • prespecified
  • 653 sites in 37 countries
  • Randomized September 2020 to January 2023

Authors' conclusion

The EMPEROR-Preserved risk models demonstrated good performance in FINEARTS-HF. Baseline risk did not modify the relative treatment effect of finerenone.

Study context

Population
Adults aged ≥40 years with symptomatic heart failure (HF) and left ventricular EF (LVEF) ≥40%
Participants
6,001 adults
Comparison
Finerenone vs placebo across EMPEROR-Preserved baseline risk quintiles
  • Finerenonen = 3,003
  • Placebon = 2,998reference
Primary endpoint
Performance of EMPEROR-Preserved risk models (first HF hospitalization or CV death, CV death, all-cause death) and treatment effect of finerenone across risk quintiles
Follow-up
Median 32 (IQR 23-37) months

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

First HF hospitalization or CV death, finerenone vs placebo by risk quintile
Finerenone vs PlaceboHazard ratio (95% CI)
Q1
0.93(0.58–1.49)
Q2
1.04(0.76–1.43)
Q3
0.82(0.62–1.07)
Q4
0.81(0.65–1.01)
Q5
0.88(0.74–1.05)

Further findings

OutcomeHR (95% CI)
Risk model prognostic performance (Q5 vs Q1) — Q5 vs Q1 · HF hospitalization or CV death10.49 (8.14–13.52)
Risk model prognostic performance (Q5 vs Q1) — Q5 vs Q1 · CV death13.47 (8.79–20.64)

Risk model prognostic performance (Q5 vs Q1)

Good discrimination (Harrell C statistic)

Original publication

EMPEROR-Preserved Risk Model and Outcomes in the FINEARTS-HF Trial. JAMA Cardiol. Published 1 May 2026. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2026.1049

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it