Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyCohort study

Evolution of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator shock therapy in children in the era of optimized implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) programming and remote monitoring

EuropacePublished

  • Retrospective cohort study
  • multicentre

Authors' conclusion

The incidence of ICD shocks has significantly decreased in children with implantation after 2010, which appears to be multifactorial.

Study context

Population
Children with transvenous or epicardial ICD implantationmedian follow-up 5.2 years
Participants
116 children
Exposure
ICD implantation after 2010 vs before 2010
  • After 2010n = 63
  • Before 2010n = 53reference
Outcome
ICD shocks (total, appropriate, inappropriate annual shock rate)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Annual shock rate

Total shocks

P = 0.008

Appropriate shocks

P = 0.036

Inappropriate shocks

P = 0.28

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Remote monitoring and shocks

Remote monitoring associated with decrease in total shocks (mean cumulative function (MCF))
P = 0.013
Remote monitoring associated with decrease in appropriate shocks (MCF)
P = 0.052

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) zone programmed ≥210 bpm

At appropriate vs inappropriate shocks: 86 vs. 79%
P = 0.0016
After vs before 2010: 90 vs. 76% (no significant change)
P = 0.142
Patients with vs without shocks: 79 vs. 89%
P = 0.243

Cardiac-related death

No increase in cardiac-related death

Original publication

Evolution of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator shock therapy in children in the era of optimized ICD programming and remote monitoring. Europace. Published 29 September 2025. doi:10.1093/europace/euaf240

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it