Heart failure & cardiomyopathies

Finerenone, eplerenone, and spironolactone in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of efficacy and safety

Eur J Heart FailPublished Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Authors' conclusion

In HFpEF/HFmrEF, finerenone was the only MRA to significantly reduce hospitalization for HF, while no agent significantly reduced cardiovascular mortality and hyperkalaemia risk increased across therapies.

Study context

Population
Adults with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or HF with mildly reduced EF (LVEF ≥40%)
Participants
10,644 adults · 8 RCTs
Comparison
Finerenone, eplerenone and spironolactone vs placebo
Outcome
Hospitalization for HF
Methodological detailsfixed-effects
  • Fixed-effects

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

CrI
Each group vs placeboRelative risk (95% CrI)
Finerenone
0.84(0.75–0.93)
Spironolactone
0.86(0.73–1.01)
Eplerenone
0.86(0.59–1.26)

Further pooled results

OutcomeRR (95% CrI)
CV mortalityFinerenone vs Placebo · CrI0.93 (0.78–1.10)
CV mortalitySpironolactone vs Placebo · CrI0.93 (0.76–1.14)
CV mortalityEplerenone vs Placebo · CrI1.10 (0.29–5.69)
  • CV mortality: 95% CrI

CV mortality

No MRA significantly reduced CV mortality vs placebo

Safety

OutcomeRR (95% CrI)
HyperkalaemiaFinerenone vs Placebo · CrI2.06 (1.77–2.41)
HyperkalaemiaSpironolactone vs Placebo · CrI2.13 (1.81–2.53)
HyperkalaemiaEplerenone vs Placebo · CrI2.17 (0.75–7.97)
  • Hyperkalaemia: 95% CrI

Original publication

Finerenone, eplerenone, and spironolactone in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of efficacy and safety. Eur J Heart Fail. Published 14 March 2026. doi:10.1093/ejhf/xuag083

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.