Heart failure & cardiomyopathiesSecondary analysis

Finerenone, Glycaemic Status, and Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Prespecified Analysis of the FINEARTS-HF Trial

Eur J Heart FailPublished

  • Secondary analysis of the FINEARTS-HF randomised trial
  • prespecified analysis

Authors' conclusion

In patients with HF with mildly reduced/preserved ejection fraction, the beneficial effects of finerenone, compared with placebo, on clinical events and symptoms, were consistent, irrespective of glycaemic status at baseline.

Study context

Population
Heart failure (HF) with NYHA II–IV, LVEF ≥40%, structural heart disease and elevated NT-proBNP; subgroups by glycaemic status (normoglycaemia, pre-diabetes, diabetes)
Participants
6,001 participants
Comparison
Finerenone vs placebo, by glycaemic status
Primary endpoint
CV death and total worsening HF events

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

CV death and total worsening HF events, finerenone vs placebo by glycaemic status
Finerenone vs PlaceboRelative risk (95% CI)
normoglycaemia
0.85(0.63–1.14)
pre-diabetes
0.85(0.66–1.08)
diabetes
0.82(0.69–0.98)

Further findings

OutcomeValuesadjusted RR (95% CI)
Primary endpoint rate by glycaemic status (vs normoglycaemia) — Pre-diabetes vs Normoglycaemia1.02 (0.84–1.23)
Primary endpoint rate by glycaemic status (vs normoglycaemia) — Diabetes vs Normoglycaemia1.32 (1.11–1.58)
OutcomeValuesEstimate
Glycaemic status at baselineNormoglycaemia 20.8% · Pre-diabetes 33.1% · Diabetes 46.2%

Components of primary outcome, all-cause death, composite kidney endpoints, KCCQ total symptom score improvement

Effects of finerenone not modified by glycaemic status

Original publication

Finerenone, Glycaemic Status, and Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Prespecified Analysis of the FINEARTS-HF Trial. Eur J Heart Fail. Published 10 April 2025. doi:10.1002/ejhf.3649

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it