Valvular & structural heart diseaseRandomised controlled trial

Flecainide to Prevent Atrial Arrhythmia After Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: AFLOAT Study, A Randomized Clinical Trial

CirculationPublished

  • Randomised controlled trial
  • prospective
  • multicentre
  • open-label
  • superiority
  • blinded end point evaluation (PROBE)
  • 1:1:1 randomisation

Authors' conclusion

Flecainide did not prevent AA after PFO closure.

Study context

Population
Patients after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure
Participants
186 patients
Comparison
Flecainide for 3 or 6 months vs standard of care after PFO closure
  • Flecainide 3 monthsn = 63
  • Flecainide 6 monthsn = 60
  • Standard of caren = 63reference
Primary endpoint
≥1 episode of atrial arrhythmia (≥30 seconds) on insertable cardiac monitor
Follow-up
Within 3 months after PFO closure

Primary result

Atrial arrhythmia (≥30 seconds)

Risk difference

1.4%

95% CI −12.9% to 13.8%

NS

Events by treatment group

Flecainide ≥3 months vs Standard of care
risk difference 1.4% (95% CI −12.9% to 13.8%); NS

As reported in the abstract

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeFlecainide 3 monthsFlecainide 6 monthsStandard of carerisk difference (95% CI)
Atrial arrhythmia (≥30 seconds) · 3- to 6-month period after PFO closure — Flecainide 6 months vs Standard of care6.3%5.0%7.9%−2.9% (−12.7% to 6.9%)
Atrial arrhythmia (≥30 seconds) · 3- to 6-month period after PFO closure — Flecainide 3 months vs Standard of care−1.6% (−11.8% to 8.6%)

Atrial arrhythmia (≥30 seconds), all patients · 6-month follow-up

Atrial arrhythmia (AA) in all patients
53 (28.5%)
AA events in first month after PFO closure
86.8%

Original publication

Flecainide to Prevent Atrial Arrhythmia After Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: AFLOAT Study, A Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. Published 2 September 2024. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.124.071186

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it