Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Bypass Surgery for 3-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: 3-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 3 Trial
Primary result · Death, MI or strokeResult — go to the resultHazard ratio 1.3 95% CI 0.98–1.83Authors' conclusion
At 3-year follow-up, there was no difference in the incidence of the composite of death, MI, or stroke after FFR-guided PCI with current-generation drug-eluting stents compared with CABG. There was a higher incidence of MI after PCI compared with CABG, with no difference in death or stroke.
Study context
- Population
- Patients with 3-vessel CAD not involving the left main coronary arteryfollow-up >96%
- Participants
- 1,500 patients
- Comparison
- Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided PCI vs coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
- Primary endpoint
- Prespecified key secondary end point: composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke
- Follow-up
- 3 years
Methodological detailsinvestigator-initiated, multicentre, international, 48 centres
- Investigator-initiated
- Multicentre
- International
- 48 centres
Primary result
Death, MI or stroke
Hazard ratio
1.3
95% CI 0.98–1.83
P = 0.07
By group
FFR-guided PCI vs CABG
HR 1.3 (95% CI 0.98–1.83); P = 0.07
As reported in the abstract
Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.
Original publication
Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided PCI or Coronary Bypass Surgery for 3-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: 3-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 3 Trial. Circulation. Published 21 August 2023. doi:10.
Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it