Arrhythmias & electrophysiology

Genetic Testing in Brugada Syndrome: A 30-Year Experience

Circ Arrhythm ElectrophysiolPublished Prospective registry cohort study

Authors' conclusion

In a large BrS cohort, the yield for SCN5A+ is 20.8%. A predicted loss of function variant carrier is an independent predictor of VA.

Study context

Population
Patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) with large gene panel genetic analysis, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel registry, 1992–2022
Participants
500 patients
Exposure
SCN5A+ vs SCN5A-; predicted loss of function vs missense variant carriers vs no variant
  • SCN5A+n = 104
  • SCN5A-n = 396reference
Outcome
Diagnostic yield of a large gene panel (ACMG classification) and prognosis (ventricular arrhythmia) of SCN5A and non-SCN5A variants
Methodological detailssingle-centre registry
  • Single-centre registry

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Diagnostic yield
Non-SCN5A gene variant
75 (15.0%)
Non-SCN5A missense variant
58 (77.3%)
Non-SCN5A predicted loss of function variant
17 (22.7%)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) · follow-up of 84.0 months

Patients with VA (overall)
48 (9.6%)
Higher VA-free survival without any variant vs predicted loss of function carriers (SCN5A+ or non-SCN5A)
No difference in VA-free survival between no variant and missense variant carriers (SCN5A+ or non-SCN5A)
SCN5A+ or non-SCN5A predicted loss of function variant independent predictor of VA (Cox analysis)

Original publication

Genetic Testing in Brugada Syndrome: A 30-Year Experience. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. Published 1 March 2024. doi:10.1161/circep.123.012374

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.