Arrhythmias & electrophysiologyCohort study

Haemolysis and renal effects across pulsed field ablation systems in atrial fibrillation

EuropacePublished

  • Prospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

In this large cohort, contemporary PFA systems appear safe but catheter design influences the extent of haemolysis, AKI, and myocardial injury.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing pulsed field ablation for AF
Participants
239 patients
Exposure
Pentaspline vs balloon-in-basket vs lattice-tip pulsed field ablation (PFA) catheters
  • Pentasplinen = 107
  • Balloon-in-basketn = 71
  • Lattice-tipn = 61
Outcome
Laboratory markers of haemolysis, myocardial injury, renal function and haemoglobin
Follow-up
Pre- and 24h post-procedure

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Haptoglobin, pre vs post · 24h post-procedure
GroupPrePostP
Pentaspline99.8 mg/dL (70.2-122)55.7 mg/dL (23.2-91.8)P < 0.001
Lattice-tipP = 0.074
Balloon-in-basketP = 0.201

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeP value
Myocardial injury markers · 24h post-procedure — Lattice-tip vs Pentaspline · lower with lattice-tipP < 0.001
Myocardial injury markers · 24h post-procedure — Lattice-tip vs Balloon-in-basket · lower with lattice-tipP < 0.001
Myocardial injury markers · 24h post-procedure — Pentaspline vs Balloon-in-basketP = n.s.

Myocardial injury markers · 24h post-procedure

Myocardial markers increased in all groups

Safety

AKI · 24h post-procedure

  • Acute kidney injury (AKI): P = 0.020

Original publication

Haemolysis and renal effects across pulsed field ablation systems in atrial fibrillation. Europace. Published 30 July 2026. doi:10.1093/europace/euag190

Summarised from the published abstract; every number is checked against it